Eric Hixson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that recognizing standing of association to challenge insurance regulation affecting members effectuates purposes of Rule 17(a)
• finding actual controversy where there was \a dispute over an official interpretation of a statute and the validity of a regulation promulgated pursuant to that interpretation\
• party has standing when alleging “injury within the area of concern of the statute or regulatory scheme under which the injurious action has occurred”
• to establish standing to challenge governmental action, alleged injury must fall \within the area of concern of the statute or regulatory scheme\
• MAIIAB was a real party in interest; allowing associational standing avoids multiplicity of actions and insures the interests of the members
• “In order for a court to entertain a petition for declaratory relief, an ‘actual controversy’ sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss must appear on the pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).