Skip to main content
· 8/6/2015

Eric Daly v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and RJ Reynolds

Citations

  • 121 A.3d 1257
  • 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 359
  • 2015 WL 4714183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “we did not explicitly answer,” “did not clearly decide,” “we have no problem in now formally holding.”
  • explaining that the interpretation the court applied in an earlier case was “not binding precedent, given the [petitioners‟] concession in that case”
  • “[I]t is well-established” that we read statutes and regulations “as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburne-Rigsby, Easterly, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.