Eric Cox and Pea Cocks Corp. d/b/a Cox's Pub v. Mayerstein-Burnell Co., Inc. d/b/a MBAH Insurance and Jeff Clute

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the non-movant was not required to negate an assumption of duty argument in summary judgment proceedings where assumption was not pled
• finding an agent owed no special duty to advise a client because their relationship lasted about a month and the agent only provided options for general property and casualty policies and did not select the policy at issue
• no assumption of duty when the agent made no representations or assurance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).