Skip to main content
· 11/12/1921

Erhardt v. City of Rosedale

Citations

  • 109 Kan. 688
  • 201 P. 1108
  • 1921 Kan. LEXIS 347

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Action for Services as Attorney' — No Material Error in the Record. The evidence examined and held to support the verdict and findings of the jury.</p> <p>2. Same. Criticised rulings touching the admission of evidence held to have been proper.</p> <p>3. Same. Certain uncomplimentary remarks of counsel held not to have been materially prejudicial. •</p> <p>4. Same. The instructions complained of, one for no assigned reason, and others because unsupported by evidence, held to have been properly given.</p> <p>5. Same. Refusal to give a certain requested instruction approved.</p>

Judges: West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.