Eres N v. v. Citgo Asphalt Refining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that availability of process to compel attendance does not weigh in favor of transfer when no witness indicated unwillingness to testify
• finding that availability of process to compel attendance does not weigh in favor of transfer when no witness indicated unwillingness to testify
• finding that the locus of operative facts “weigh[ed] in favor of a transfer because at least some of the operative events most likely [took] place in the Southern District of Texas, and there is no indication that any of the operative events took place in New York”
• “documents may be transferred… across the country with little difficulty, using electronic means of duplication and transmission.”
• “[A] transfer would allow one court to perform a full analysis of the documents and the circumstances surrounding their execution, and that court can then render one ruling interpreting all of the contracts in their entirety.”
• “[A] transfer would allow one court to perform a full analysis of the documents and the circumstances surrounding their execution, and that court can then render one ruling interpreting all of the contracts in their entirety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).