Erdman v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding long-term substitute for two-and-a-half years ineligible for benefits when assured per diem employment
• “So long as the claimant desires and intends to continue substitute work and [the employer] expects to offer such work . . . the employment relationship of a substitute teacher remains viable”
• “The statute does not require that the reemployment be in the same capacity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).