Erbeck v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The inconsistency of opinions where multiple parties are suing one defendant in similar (albeit not identical) fact situations is the exact instance where it would be unfair for the trial court to allow the use of offensive collateral estoppel against [a] defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).