Skip to main content
· 8/30/2000

Erbaugh v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Citations

  • 126 F. Supp. 2d 1079
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20693
  • 2000 WL 1911493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \the prevailing practice is to grant a party whose state-law claims have been removed on the basis of complete preemption leave to filed an amended complaint\
  • recognizing the inconsistency of removing claims pleaded under state law on grounds of ERISA preemption and then seeking a merits dismissal - 2 - of the implicit federal claim because it was misconceived as arising under state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.