Erazo-Martinez v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Browning, Senate Select Comm. on Pres. Campaign Activities v. Nixon, 366 F. Supp. 51, 55 (D.D.C. 1973) (footnotes omitted
• explaining Jordan’s requirements “must” be met “for a written rejection of [UM] coverage to be valid”
• finding CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement met when the plaintiffs requested injunctive and declaratory relief that would require the defendants to extend coverage, giving the plaintiffs the monetary benefit in the value of the added coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).