E.R. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State's failure to prove value of property stolen required reversal of adjudication of delinquency
• reversing third-degree grand theft conviction as fundamental error, relying on T.E.J., because the State failed to prove that the value of the property exceeded $300 and ordering the conviction reduced to second-degree petit theft
• reversing third-degree grand theft conviction as fundamental error, relying on T.E.J., because the State failed to prove that the value of the property exceeded $300 and ordering the conviction reduced to second-degree petit theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• F.B. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 200×
• Pena v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-24· cited 78×
• Stanford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-20· cited 5×
• FB v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 2×
• ER v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-26

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• T.E.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-14· cited 14×