ER Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff cannot maintain a failure-to-warn action where he simply chooses not to read a legible warning
• explaining that \a plaintiff who does not read an allegedly inadequate warning cannot maintain a negligent-failure-to adequately-warn action unless the nature of the alleged inadequacy is such that it prevents him from reading it\
• explaining that the situation of an “allegedly inadequate, unspecific warning” is in contrast to cases in which the plaintiff cannot read at all or the warning provided was “inadequate with respect to prominence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).