Skip to main content
· 5/8/1980

Equitable Shipyards, Inc. v. State

Citations

  • 611 P.2d 396
  • 93 Wash. 2d 465
  • 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in determining if a law is unconstitutional because special, the focus is on what the law excludes
  • independent and individual examination of documents by commission members prior to open meeting where contract was awarded did not violate the OPMA
  • \We recognize the statutory statement of purpose in [the OPMA] employs some of the strongest language used in any legislation.\
  • in determining if a law is unconstitutional because special, the focus is on what the law excludes
  • the statement of purpose in the OPMA \employs some of the strongest language used in any legislation\
  • independent and individual examination of documents by commission members prior to open meeting where contract was awarded did not violate the OPMA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hicks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.