Skip to main content
· 2/20/1899

Equitable Securities Co. v. Block

Citations

  • 51 La. Ann. 478
  • 25 So. 271
  • 1899 La. LEXIS 425

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The asserted mortgage of the wife was cancelled twice on separate rules filed, and served upon all parties concerned.-</p> <p>The court had jurisdiction over the subject matter, and passed upon questions at issue. Whether the court’s decisions on these rules were erroneous or correct, do not present grounds enough for collateral attacks of the proceedings.</p> <p>The third opponent cannot treat the judgments ordering cancellation of the mortgage as absolute nullities, and recover the proceeds of the sale of the property on which she claims she has a mortgage, (by way of a third opposition).</p> <p>Even on a confession of a married woman (if there be anything in the nature of consent in these cancellations), a direct action must be brought to annul a judgment. Bell vs. I’rank, 23rd Ann. 599.</p>

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.