Equitable Life Assurance Society v. James River Associates (In Re James River Associates)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 2% equity cushion is insufficient to provide adequate protection because of the deterioration of the equity cushion from accumulating interest
• holding that a continued failure to make mortgage payments along with a non-existent equity cushion can constitute “cause”
• holding that a 2% equity cushion is insufficient to provide adequate protection because of the deterioration of the equity cushion from accumulating interest
• holding that continued failure to make monthly payments under loan documents in a Chapter 11 case constitute cause for granting relief from automatic stay
• holding that a 2% equity cushion is insufficient to provide adequate protection
• first citing In re Kost, 102 B.R. 829, 831 (D. Wyo. 1989); then citing In re Lane, 108 B.R. 6, 7 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).