Skip to main content
· 4/13/1993

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Bell

Citations

  • 818 F. Supp. 245
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • insurer’s interpretation, that incontestability language referring to “existing” conditions does not speak to situation where sickness has manifested itself, “does not give [the] clause its plain meaning”
  • insurer's interpretation, that incontestability language referring to \existing\ conditions does not speak to situation where sickness has manifested itself, \does not give [the] clause its plain meaning\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lozano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.