Equilease Corporation, a New York Corporation v. John G. Hentz, Jr., and Third Party v. Lester Lando, Third-Party

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Florida law and stating, “[I]t is patently unfair to require an innocent payee who has received and used the money to satisfy a debt to repay the money”
• applying Florida law and stating, “[I]t is patently unfair to require an innocent payee who has received and used the money to satisfy a debt to repay the money”
• applying Florida law and stating, “[I]t is patently unfair to require an innocent payee who has received and used the money to satisfy a debt to repay the money”
• “It is patently unfair to require an innocent payee who has received and used the money to satisfy a debt to repay the money.” (emphasis added)
• “It is patently unfair to require an innocent payee who has received and used the money to satisfy a debt to repay the money.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).