Equal Rights Center v. NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court did not abuse discretion by denying leave to amend after close of discovery
• finding the same and holding that a disgorgement award was consistent with Liu where the final judgment did not identify any harmed investors to whom the disgorged profits would be returned
• leave to amend a complaint should be denied “when the amendment would be futile.”
• “[A] district court has discretion to deny a motion to amend a complaint, so long as it does not outright refuse to grant the leave without any justifying reason.” (citation omitted)
• “[A] district court has discretion to deny a motion to amend a complaint, so long as it does not outright refuse to grant the leave without any justifying reason.” (citation omitted)
• in denying Rule 60 motion, noting that sending disgorged funds to Treasury was “consistent with Liu” where no harmed investors to whom disgorged profits should be returned were identified in the complaint or final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).