Equal Rights Center v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that The Equal Rights Center, while it lacked organizational standing, had associational standing to litigate the alleged discrimination against its members
• confining scope of associational standing in ADA case to locations where members of plaintiff organization had actually “encounter[ed] barriers” and stores they had been “deterred from patronizing”
• \[D]iversion of funds and frustration of an organization's missions are injuries sufficient to establish standing under Article III....\
• “Congress has not evinced an intention to eliminate prudential limitations on standing to assert claims under Title III of the ADA.”
• finding standing for plaintiffs seeking declaratory relief under the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).