Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Dolgencorp, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that habeas petition was not moot even though it challenged state court order that had already expired
• holding that habeas petition was not moot even though it challenged state court order that had already expired because petitioner had proved a continuing injury
• “A habeas petition is generally not moot so long as the petitioner continues to be held in the custody that he alleges is unlawful.”
• “While in the custody of the New York State Office of Mental Health, Janakievski filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 Aparicio v. Artuz, 269 F.3d 78, 89 (2d Cir. 2001
• “If, as a result of changed circumstances, a case that presented an actual redressable injury at the time it was filed ceases to involve such an injury, it ceases to fall within a court’s Article III subject matter jurisdiction and must be dismissed for mootness.”
• “If, as a result of changed circumstances, a case that presented an actual redressable injury at the time it was filed ceases to involve such an injury, it ceases to fall within a federal court's Article III subject matter jurisdiction and must be dismissed for mootness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).