Skip to main content
· 8/24/1989

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. White and Son Enterprises, a Corporation

Citations

  • 881 F.2d 1006
  • 29 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 719
  • 101 A.L.R. Fed. 203
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12583
  • 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,270
  • 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute of limitations defense was waived when the defendant did not raise it until three days before trial
  • concluding that unofficial complaints by women regarding fact that they did not receive a raise as did men at factory “constituted an assertion of rights protected under the [FLSA]”
  • holding, without discussion of the verbal/ written distinction, that plaintiffs’ oral complaints were protected activity
  • stating that unofficial complaints to an employer “constitute an assertion of rights protected under the statute”
  • finding that the defendant could properly draw the court’s attention to comparators paid the same or less than the plaintiff in further analysis of the plaintiffs claim
  • noting that the anti-retaliation provision of the FLSA is “giv[en] a broad construction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Edmondson, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.