· 8/24/1989
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. White and Son Enterprises, a Corporation
Citations
- 881 F.2d 1006
- 29 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 719
- 101 A.L.R. Fed. 203
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12583
- 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,270
- 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a statute of limitations defense was waived when the defendant did not raise it until three days before trial
- concluding that unofficial complaints by women regarding fact that they did not receive a raise as did men at factory “constituted an assertion of rights protected under the [FLSA]”
- holding, without discussion of the verbal/ written distinction, that plaintiffs’ oral complaints were protected activity
- stating that unofficial complaints to an employer “constitute an assertion of rights protected under the statute”
- finding that the defendant could properly draw the court’s attention to comparators paid the same or less than the plaintiff in further analysis of the plaintiffs claim
- noting that the anti-retaliation provision of the FLSA is “giv[en] a broad construction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Edmondson, Tuttle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.