· 4/8/2004
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Warfield-Rohr Casket Company, Incorporated
Citations
- 364 F.3d 160
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6800
- 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,651
- 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing “self-serving opinions” and “testimony replete with alleged facts” for purposes of summary judgment
- distinguishing self-serving opinions from testimony citing alleged facts for purposes of summary judgment
- decisionmaker told plaintiff, at the time he was fired, that he was being terminated because he was “getting too . . . old” and another employee was being retained 13 because that employee “could give him more years”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Michael, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.