Skip to main content
· 4/8/2004

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Warfield-Rohr Casket Company, Incorporated

Citations

  • 364 F.3d 160
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6800
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,651
  • 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing “self-serving opinions” and “testimony replete with alleged facts” for purposes of summary judgment
  • distinguishing self-serving opinions from testimony citing alleged facts for purposes of summary judgment
  • decisionmaker told plaintiff, at the time he was fired, that he was being terminated because he was “getting too . . . old” and another employee was being retained 13 because that employee “could give him more years”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Michael, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.