Skip to main content
· 1/2/2002

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Chicago Hospitals

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 326
  • 58 Fed. R. Serv. 1208
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 35
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,888
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while constructive discharge usually results because of continued discriminatory harassment, it can also be demonstrated by other means, including blatant cues that the employee is no longer wanted and will be fired if the employee doesn’t resign first
  • explaining that “[c]onstructive discharge, like actual discharge, is a materially adverse employment action”
  • finding constructive discharge when, among other signs of imminent termination, employee arrived at work to find her belongings packed and her office used for storage
  • finding constructive discharge where plaintiff arrived to work to find her belongings packed and her office used for storage
  • finding plaintiff had met burden of showing constructive discharge where plaintiff returned to work to find her belongings packed and her office converted to storage
  • relying on other facts such as the use of the employee’s office for storage, hostility toward the employee, and the packing of the employee’s belongings by her employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Coffey, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.