Skip to main content
· 2/4/2002

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unión Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos Y Alcantarillados

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 49
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 70
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1667
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,898
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the employer bears the burden to show that any accommodation would result in undue hardship
  • noting that sincerity is a credibility issue ordinarily reserved for the factfinder at trial
  • relying on First Amendment jurisprudence in evaluating the breadth of protection afforded under Title VII for a Seventh-Day Adventist
  • reversing the lower court’s grant of summary judgment because there was a genuine dispute concerning the employee’s religious belief
  • relying on First Amendment jurisprudence to define “religion” for purposes of Title VII
  • “In order to satisfy this element, the plaintiff must demonstrate both that the belief or practice is religious and it is sincerely held.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Kravitch, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.