Skip to main content
· 4/22/2015

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Breed Logistics

Citations

  • 783 F.3d 1057
  • 2015 FED App. 0074P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6650
  • 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “only one of our sister circuits” has concluded that resisting sexual advances is not protected activity under Title VII
  • “[A] demand that a supervisor cease his/her harassing conduct constitutes protected activity covered by Title VII.”
  • “[A] demand that a supervisor cease his/her harassing conduct constitutes protected activity covered by Title VII.”
  • in the interest of judicial efficiency, addressing overlapping motions together and issue by issue
  • worker subjected to repeated sexually suggestive comments “several times a day, ‘every day’”
  • Title VII opposition clause protects employee who resists or confronts supervisor harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Keith, Batchelder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.