Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Harris Chernin, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the EEOC's\interests are broader than those of the individuals injured by discrimination . . . private litigants cannot adequately represent the government's interest in enforcing the prohibitions of federal statutes\ (citations omitted)
• holding that the preclusive effect of federal judgment is governed by federal law
• concluding that because the EEOC's\interests are broader than those of the individuals injured by discrimination . . . private litigants cannot adequately represent the government's interest in enforcing the prohibitions of federal statutes\ (citations omitted)
• holding that the EEOC’s claim for individual monetary relief was barred by res judicata because the individual on whose behalf the EEOC brought suit previously had been dismissed for failure to file a timely charge of discrimination
• suggesting that the EEOC is ordinarily entitled to injunctive relief where it proves a violation of Title VII and the defendant-employer fails to prove that the violation is not likely to recur
• precluding EEOC suit where employee filed suit on the same claim prior to the EEOC and lost on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).