Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Grief Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that typicality does not require that the named plaintiffs’ claim be “identical to those of absent class members”
• noting that the requirements of typicality and adequacy “tend to merge”
• noting that “[t]he requirements of typicality and adequacy tend to merge”
• “[T]he amount in controversy as to each applicable Local 11 member is between approximately $600 and no more than $1,500 . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).