Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the jury must also find “[t]hat the decision maker acted within the scope of his employment in making the challenged decision” (emphasis added)
• noting that Title I of the ADA governs failure-to-accommodate claims and incorporates the remedy provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1981a
• finding that reprehensibility was in favor of the Plaintiff where at least three of the five factors had sufficient evidence
• holding expressly, with regard to ah “unconstitutionally excessive” punitive damages award, that the Fourth Circuit was under an “obligation to order a remittitur or award a new trial” (emphasis added)
• noting that exemplary damages award that falls within statutory cap is reasonable and constitutional
• noting that exemplary damages award that falls within statutory cap is reasonable and constitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).