Skip to main content
· 12/17/2015

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Citations

  • 809 F.3d 335
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21963
  • 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Several circuit courts, including ours, have beld that conditioning benefits on promises not to file charges with the EEOC is not enough, in itself, to constitute ‘retaliation’ actionable under Title VII.”
  • “Several circuit courts, including ours, have held that conditioning benefits on promises not to file charges with the EEOC is not enough, in itself, to constitute ‘retaliation’ actionable under Title VII.” (citing cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Manton, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.