· 12/17/2015
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Citations
- 809 F.3d 335
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21963
- 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Several circuit courts, including ours, have beld that conditioning benefits on promises not to file charges with the EEOC is not enough, in itself, to constitute ‘retaliation’ actionable under Title VII.”
- “Several circuit courts, including ours, have held that conditioning benefits on promises not to file charges with the EEOC is not enough, in itself, to constitute ‘retaliation’ actionable under Title VII.” (citing cases)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Manton, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.