Skip to main content
· 9/23/1980

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF JANESVILLE, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 630 F.2d 1254
  • 24 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1294
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13793
  • 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no irreparable injury \in the absence of a showing that\ retired firefighter would \suffer 'deterioration of his skill'\
  • stating in dictum that the city’s submission of reports evidencing the Wisconsin Legislature’s judgment that age is a BFOQ for the entire class of protective service jobs may be enough to establish a BFOQ defense
  • “Reinstatement pending a trial on the merits ... is an extraordinary remedy permissible only upon a substantial showing of irreparable injury.”
  • district court abused its discretion by reinstating fired police chief pending trial on the merits given the lack of irreparable harm
  • “Reinstatement pending a trial on the merits . . . is an extraordinary remedy permissible only upon a substantial showing of irreparable injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Bauer, Crowley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.