Skip to main content
· 1/9/1979

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CAMBRIDGE TILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 590 F.2d 205
  • 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1378
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17764
  • 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the EEOC has the power to “investigate a broader picture of discrimination which unfolds in the course of a reasonable investigation of a specific charge’
  • \Notions of relevancy at the investigatory stage are very broad.\
  • Notions of relevancy at investigatory stage are very broad, and so long as EEOC is not wandering into wholly unrelated areas, it has the power to subpoena documents concerning any employer practice which may shed light on discrimination charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lively, Peck, Per Curiam, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.