· 3/6/1997
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee v. YENKIN-MAJESTIC PAINT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 112 F.3d 831
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348
- 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,676
- 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”
- “Although it is true that a factfinder should refrain from probing an employer’s business judgment, a decision to terminate an employee based upon unlawful considerations does not become legitimate because it can be characterized as a business decision.”
- remanding for balancing of equities prior to reinstatement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, Cole, Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.