Skip to main content
· 12/27/1979

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUZZENS OF GEORGIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 608 F.2d 1062
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9356
  • 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,539
  • 21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “an employer served with an EEOC subpoena and making no effort to exhaust the available administrative remedies may not thereafter challenge the subsequent judicial enforcement of that subpoena for any reason short of objections based on constitutional grounds”
  • finding failure to exhaust barred challenges to judicial enforcement of subpoena for any reason other than objections based on constitutional grounds
  • “Generally, one who has neglected the exhaustion of available administrative remedies may not seek judicial relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Krav-Itch, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.