· 12/27/1979
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUZZENS OF GEORGIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 608 F.2d 1062
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9356
- 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,539
- 21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 803
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an employer served with an EEOC subpoena and making no effort to exhaust the available administrative remedies may not thereafter challenge the subsequent judicial enforcement of that subpoena for any reason short of objections based on constitutional grounds”
- finding failure to exhaust barred challenges to judicial enforcement of subpoena for any reason other than objections based on constitutional grounds
- “Generally, one who has neglected the exhaustion of available administrative remedies may not seek judicial relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman, Krav-Itch, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.