· 3/19/1976
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL MOTOR LINES, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 537 F.2d 1162
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12289
- 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,780
- 20 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1762
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- successive Rule 59 motions do not toll the period allowed for filing a notice of appeal
- second Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) motion filed not after new judgment entered, but after first Rule 4(a)(4) motion denied
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Russell, Widener, Thomsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.