Skip to main content
· 8/21/1995

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Applicant-Appellee v. Quad/graphics, Incorporated

Citations

  • 63 F.3d 642
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23914
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding respondent would not be required to interview unsuccessful applicants over whom it no longer had control
  • rejecting burdensomeness argument in part because EEOC’s offer of random sampling would reduce by ninety percent the time involved in complying with the subpoena
  • rejecting burdensomeness argument in part because EEOC’s offer of random sampling would reduce by ninety percent the time involved in complying with the subpoena

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Ripple, Will

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.