Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Barbara Contreras v. Maricopa County Community College District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that EPA was .violated because the defendant did not compensate plaintiff with neither “back pay or retroactive seniority”
• reviewing for clear error the district court’s factual conclusion that a party had sustained its burden of proving that a statutory provision applied
• applying clear error review to a summary judgment decision issued on stipulated facts
• minor differences in responsibility do not make the Equal Pay Act standard inapplicable
• elements of prima facie case of wage discrimination under federal Equal Pay Act
• letters of supervisor and university dean that plaintiff performed same job as two male employees with different titles, plus showing that plaintiff was paid lower salary than males, was sufficient to establish pri-ma facie case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).