Epstein v. Saul Ewing LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where an order is entered in a party’s favor the prevailing party is not aggrieved and lacks standing to appeal
• stating, “[w]here the evidence of damages presented by the plaintiff is contested by the defendant, the jury in a civil action does not have to accept the plaintiff’s measure of damages because the jury is free to accept all, part, or none of the evidence[]”
• “A party is aggrieved by a ruling when that party has been adversely affected by the decision from which the appeal is taken.”
• “A party is aggrieved by a ruling when that party has been adversely affected by the decision from which the appeal is taken.”
• declining to address an issue where trial ruling benefitted appellant
• declining to address issue where trial ruling benefitted appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).