Epstein v. Maddox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a five-vehicle policy was “nonfleet” because “the … vehicles were not used for the insured’s business.”
• holding a five-vehicle policy was “nonfleet” because “the . . . vehicles were not used for the insured’s business.”
• finding that a policy was “nonfleet” because, while it covered five vehicles, none were used for the insured’s business
• indicating that five vehicles covered by a policy were nonfleet because they “were not used for the insured’s business”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).