Skip to main content
· 6/21/2000

Epstein v. Kalvin-Miller International, Inc.

Citations

  • 100 F. Supp. 2d 222
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 356
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8677
  • 2000 WL 798625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the employee’s type-2 diabetes was not a disability under the ADA because, as treated, it did not affect his ability to walk or limit any other major life activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.