Epstein v. Itron, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the PSLRA \indicates Congress intended to heighten . . . the quantum of the inference necessary as to defendants' unlawful state of mind\
• imputing knowledge “that [the company]’s core product is technologically incapable of meeting requirements that are central to [its] continued survival as a business entity ” only to “key officers ”
• “facts critical to a business’s core operations or an important transaction generally are so apparent that their knowledge may be attributed to the company and its key officers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).