Skip to main content
· 8/24/1990

Epstein v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 566 So. 2d 331
  • 1990 WL 123117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when policy defined “[r]esidence premises” as dwelling where insured resides, definition rendered word “ ‘residence’ ” ambiguous as to whether it meant any structure used as dwelling or structure used by insureds as their dwelling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.