· 10/27/2005
Epstein v. Galuska
Citations
- 839 N.E.2d 532
- 362 Ill. App. 3d 36
- 298 Ill. Dec. 209
- 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where an appellant’s brief fails to comply with supreme court rules, this court has the inherent authority to dismiss the appeal”
- “Where an appellant’s brief fails to comply with supreme court rules, this court has the inherent authority to dismiss the appeal.”
- “Where an appellant’s brief fails to comply with supreme court rules, this court has the inherent authority to dismiss the -6- No. 1-21-1156 appeal.”
- “Where an appellant’s brief fails to comply with supreme court rules, this court has the inherent authority to dismiss the appeal.”
- “Where an appellant’s brief fails to comply with supreme court rules, this court has the inherent authority to dismiss the appeal.”
- “Where an appellant’s brief fails to comply with supreme court rules, this court has the inherent authority to dismiss the -5- No. 1-19-2120 appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greiman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.