Epstein v. Epstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where materials sought by a party would appear to be relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, it is an abuse of discretion to deny discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Board of Trustees v. American Educational Enterprises, LLC
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 105×
• Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-09-25· cited 66×
• Palmer v. WDI Systems, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 12×
• In Re Estate of Sauey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-31· cited 7×
• All About Cruises, Inc. v. CRUISE OPTIONS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-08· cited 6×
• Foster v. Bank of America, N.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-29
• Darin Engelhardt v. Lara Aronoff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-01-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Messana v. Maule Industries
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-02-20· cited 29×
• Orlowitz v. Orlowitz
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1967-03-01· cited 29×
• Bystrom v. Whitman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-27· cited 29×