Skip to main content
· 4/14/1971

Epstein v. Corporacion Peruana de Vapores

Citations

  • 325 F. Supp. 535
  • 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying the “principal place of business” as the location of mining activities, rather than the “principal office”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.