Epps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “intrusion must be only that which is necessary to detect the presence of a weapon — and nothing more”
• stating that the \intrusion must be only that which is necessary to detect the presence of a weapon—and nothing more\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grant v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 35×
• McCain v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 16×
• State v. Taveras
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-03-22· cited 10×
• McGurk v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-07· cited 9×
• Lockard v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-29· cited 7×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-29· cited 5×
• Myers v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-06· cited 5×
• Thornton v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-07-25· cited 2×
• Rohrbaugh v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-03-31
• State v. Smith
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-03-28
• Martin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-11-21