Epps v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing the \cardinal rule that statutory [or regulatory] language must be read in context because a phrase gathers meaning from the words around it\
• “[T]he inclusion of ‘debt collection’ in the savings clause is a reflection of the Supreme Court’s recognition that generally applicable state debt collection laws apply to national banks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).