Eppright v. Kauffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[statutory noncompliance generally rises to a substantial level and prejudice to the defendant occurs when the purposes of the statute ... are contravened”
• holding statute, allowing “court” to excuse jurors from jury duty and defining “court” as a judge, was violated when clerk excused jurors “without obtaining court approval [of the excuses granted]”
• holding statutory challenge to jury-selection procedure failed in absence of showing of prejudice
• holding statute, allowing “court” to 20 excuse jurors from jury duty and defining “court” as a judge, was violated when clerk excused jurors “without obtaining court approval [of the excuses granted]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).