Eppling v. Seuntjens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was “insufficient evidence of the proper measure of damages” despite the plaintiff’s testimony regarding the number of acres affected, the expected number of bushels per acre, and the reasonable price of the crops per bushel affected by drainage issues
• limited recovery to damages sustained during the last five years where first of continuing damages accrued over six years before commencement of action
• this court refuses to engage in “speculation” in order to calculate crop damage
• “Of course defendant could turn the water that came onto his land from plaintiff’s in any manner he saw fit so long as he did not cast it upon plaintiff’s adjoining land to his damage.”
• “[I]ntermittent injuries gave rise to new causes of action when they occurred.”
• “[I]ntermittent injuries gave rise to new causes of action when they occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).