Skip to main content
· 3/29/1994

Eppling v. Schultz Dining Programs

Citations

  • 442 S.E.2d 219
  • 18 Va. App. 125
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 1098
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “excessive absenteeism caused by a non-work-related injury beyond the employee’s control is not the type of willful conduct or misbehavior that, upon termination, justifies a forfeiture of workers’ compensation benefits”
  • claimant discharged for absenteeism caused by health problems unrelated to disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.