Skip to main content
· 12/18/2009

Eppinger v. Sealy

Citations

  • 25 So. 3d 69
  • 30 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 303
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19762
  • 2009 WL 4874786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employee’s claims against firm were not subject to mandatory arbitration because they did not arise out of business activities of either employee or firm, but instead, arose out of divorce agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin, Palmer, Jacobus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.