Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/11/1976

Epperson v. Industrial Commission

Citations

549 P.2d 247
26 Ariz. App. 467
1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that despite “insufficient service under Rule 58, Rules of Procedure of the Industrial Commission of Arizona[,]” the court would “decline to attach any legal significance to the omission” given the lack of “any prejudice . . . as a result of this faulty service”
“Hearing officers, like trial judges, have broad discretion in determining whether to admit matters into evidence.”
“Hearing officers, like trial judges, have broad discretion in determining whether to admit matters into evidence.”
denying compensation where employee told receptionist not to admit her husband but told manager that he was not a threat; he shot employee in the lobby of her workplace
husband assaulted wife at work regarding domestic problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Haire, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.