Epperson v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that despite “insufficient service under Rule 58, Rules of Procedure of the Industrial Commission of Arizona[,]” the court would “decline to attach any legal significance to the omission” given the lack of “any prejudice . . . as a result of this faulty service”
• “Hearing officers, like trial judges, have broad discretion in determining whether to admit matters into evidence.”
• “Hearing officers, like trial judges, have broad discretion in determining whether to admit matters into evidence.”
• denying compensation where employee told receptionist not to admit her husband but told manager that he was not a threat; he shot employee in the lobby of her workplace
• husband assaulted wife at work regarding domestic problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).